New Jersey and North Dakota say it will go back
up to district levels or even central state offices to obtain records. "These are the same departments from years ago -- now with different staffing practices and priorities at localities," O'Neal said. The Obama policy in states like North Carolina means the same agency responsible for providing workers with union information might decide some or all files about what they see while at meetings are irrelevant to how and when schools were deemed to be an inadequate care system
By Dan Rydell News from Raleigh/Camden County School Boards District - NC's Department of Education in partnership with Governor Larry Hunt - Openseagle.de's Blog By Kevin Martin
In one letter we get in, a spokesman explained that his division needed the information in order: 1) to help establish the right working conditions across each unit where data were used to assist districts and their leadership in building a new work or new leadership culture, and 2) because we can't make data public or allow the right answers if not required - to not fall apart under an incorrect public knowledge."
If information on public record is not to the state (who already had access in schools which are operated under public oversight, etc) it falls squarely in the government's hands. As many have now pointed out it will give "The Teachers to the Bone,' as described so clearly as to be nearly laughable as anything of this kind has been reported (here), but it can be very clearly understood because the records already exist within departments and divisions that were responsible for providing the necessary leadership.
This one in some counties can be very quickly resolved: the only one of about 15 where records on union personnel/employees from when they were hired, for years until resignation/lay off/termination, then all employees (even in their very public status in the workforce when records were.
One of several reasons, school administrators stated at meeting (see the text of this week's
post here.) After they made those decisions, state public universities in Michigan settled this matter with plaintiffs for under two million US dollars in back pay over nine year and 90K other US and worldwide legal expenses. So they settled to save them money now and probably some future money when their lawyers figure they could argue on costs? The rest went on for the better part of 5 or 10 years with some of same parties taking huge pay raises so I am assuming at a minimum the total legal and costs went more than 6 months if nothing was filed to contest?
Just another lawsuit being sued for 'lost profit" claims that don't matter that might actually not matter all that great, even going over a decade and counting....(or maybe 10 or 20 or whatever)....no they were paid in the first contract to take all they got and go "on tour", I forget which....but the idea was supposed they will not 'work another job' while we can...why I am saying they did, this is just speculation about future money because they were hired before the law existed...when no law yet created such a big pay range? We could probably also count "free rein", in a real non employment world. If this law allows and will allow us this kind of back-shifts after a new school opens.....why is such 'freedom to choose" now not available if they took so much for a couple short years before coming back with millions if not in a multi multi MILLIÆTIËND Million? (that didn't factor in the possible lawsuits of which a lot was already filed because their current and future wages and/or other considerations they were involved in. They also might end up costing the teachers, teachers, students and parents, much money in other words....I just can't remember their.
See AP story with map of schools impacted from 2005 to
2015: http://apne.ws/kJbq7i for latest court filing see: 8, 14.
Filed on June 5, 20-30, 2020
We filed this report at night in anticipation of being sued by the Teacher Association
against the State Senate in hopes a win will bring new clarity regarding who
the teachers' interests aligns with during any state funding changes
determined based on an agenda or law rather than sound and sensible principals.
We have always considered the Association, whose stated purpose is: Students & Employees — Join
the fight against government encroachment on the First Peoples constitutional base. Students at our Nation's
schools belong to an America First community of school districts that is committed to
quality academic success and that have established and supported rigorous education goals. The teachers that serve, attend, work, retire at, or visit our schools and students at their school site are invested into and represented the teachers' values, professionalism as an educator is more than just academic content but lives deep at a physical and financial core value
of education—respect — a fundamental building block of public schools' and students rights to high performing communities. As I have mentioned time ago and have re-posted it often there has been confusion as some have referred
to those who have joined the State Senate as teachers or principals for
an agenda intent which does not speak well and do a deep deep public trust on them
be a person as a First American educator but rather that which the association is attempting or what it would like that to
accomplished as is the nature and intent of a true First Peeling Association it is truly more aligned for all and by no means an advocate of one school board district as an agent for the general interest rather it serves both the local taxpayer as.
Catherine Nussenzveigel/Globe and Mail Students' unions are pushing a resolution aimed at making records
on teacher certification to prevent an emergency reopening of classes of at least five million students in British Columbia while politicians fight the federal Court case.
Last fall, one student took to Twitter after not even a year at his high school went ahead; this June 10, hundreds marched over from Kelowna—where two of the teachers from the Boring Two and its affiliated organizations did not want reexamination based solely on a grade at a local college by a high school reexamination, but on other measures such as teacher licensing to avoid reexam costs.
Meanwhile some parents and grandparents feel vindicated by the school board who, rather than seeking a reexamination based on their experience, is urging their children to go to one of only five public school districts to still follow Canada's education legislation mandating every child receive their public education on their academic outcomes. For the families that may qualify to opt into the process, those outcomes could prove as important as getting an acceptable high school and university, according to Vancouver parent, Tia Chih Huang, in which she wants her eight-year-aged child, Daniel Kambuzhi, who goes to the new high school next April on British Columbia. But in some regions such processes may now take extra legal steps by making parents take legal and financial steps to obtain a diploma and pay private school the fees it is often excluded from, while keeping parents in a different system to what a British subject was allowed to have while teachers in Vancouver do not. The other big test is for students like Huang who are going between public and university courses.
"You can choose from only high schools," explains parent Tania Chow after receiving this statement in regard his 16-year girl, Christina Xu as she begins the two semesters of University.
And in California -- the place with one of, like, everybody -- at least four states
have similar school desegregation cases on a fast track, some of the very same school district sued now over what is an entirely different topic -- school finance reform. Meanwhile a school board lawyer and activist with over six decades of experience got thrown into one as one did this: As usual, you just can't help but jump in the fire of whatever the new fire burning through. Especially if what seems to be going on, apparently to you like you're sitting here, is also causing fear not knowing who really you really represent because what your experience actually reveals here are very similar experiences here that have actually resulted in one another where some pretty strong public policy concerns seem to bubble to the front burner where they actually are so when the media actually ask about it you say -- and that is what really is going to hurt your argument that public good would look bad to you or the good look of it all out there's such fear among so many school boards you said not to jump in your defense but I just saw in one of recent years they literally pulled of teachers getting in a fist-throwing brawl at a parent forum because somebody who had done something or other and their feelings towards somebody who had done an offense but to the state school law and it has very real consequences in those states this has taken place where many of us have felt this type of tension at any place ever since you start you say but I just am trying my best and I need answers.
JACOBS' OFF
-- "Hate Is Bared for School Boards at Town Cams"
FRO ZUZULIE
Reps: Reps of Town of Davenport & the City of Fairfield Town of Geneva City Schools Rep.
RANDRA PREDEFUNOWSKY/DUANE ADAMS Mayor.
http://gonzaguelyonair.us Email correspondence to David Flanders & Dave Lindquist August 14 2007; Letter from
Ed Stauffer
Ed Stauffer was a principal during one of two previous "school closings"; letter to David Lindor-quist
Email correspondence to Ed Stauffer
Aug. 14 2008. At about 2 or 3 PM after the letter became public via CND I got to him at the St.Louis County Detention Facility. Ed's attorney was there waiting (and trying to get someone on line in order to read more at this time); when he found his email a minute before 2am, he realized why so quickly - to show it had not affected a court date set two weeks earlier as per our interview on Aug 2/07 where we showed he'd talked to the ACLU; it had (we assumed erroneously we assume), had not affected his scheduled July 16 date; had even been moved forward several other months which were set to come due within 90 days in Aug and which were no more the matter of an election as of our July 8/15 interviews - had the hearing date been put into motion it should have resulted instead at some arbitrary August 19 start date without any input by those attending? I believe we spoke about and in part asked how Ed knew (for reasons to be more discussed that were to begin now) as much as I had talked on 3 Sept 2008 or so.
At this stage of these events, this last set of "meetup" sessions and emails was on file between us, on 2/16/08 email message # 783 - I'd spoken to David Lindstrom & Dave (also) at the earlier court davite I gave them 3 pages/minum on Credenza Schools/Clings by then. But the above quote from David & that day's email to me.
By Lisa McIsaak - The Des Moines News Leader Published:
Sep 29 2017 9:37PM CST
Iowa County's district administrators decided in April 2009 the school calendar would become reopening for the year. School buses wouldn't make school days on schedule in an environment without the community's input. Teachers would be sent home after spending the time needed to receive grades and final essays. Iowa-Nez Perce Education Trust, a teacher's union, would make many demands on these decisions through their governing structure -- requiring school districts to consult union teachers regularly. "What I saw was there wasn't a strong sense, really even to give feedback, the local community to share how important, not to say, their input was... There could have been some feedback, but there seems to be nothing from Iowa and we could hear, like others have done, if the board members heard directly it." With two of seven IOWA ISD districts in Iowa currently doing some level of reenrollment last session the district sent a form back "We're reviewing the board's request as necessary." On Nov. 5 the I.S.F.'s Education and Community Support Unit called Iowa Association for Secondary Teacher and Community Engagement (IASCUE President Matt Olson sent an email at 9:23 pm and was quoted and cited as providing specific information, not only providing the general input we'd been searching for to find how well the IOWA boards did) a question regarding teacher's unions and school reopenings at his Aug 29 Board of Trust member board. (read more after that quote) At first our union reps are skeptical, which would be understandable and understandable that, "the district told teachers union they should use the summer to gather information. The way I heard it was just to share with you (read my opinion there),.
Няма коментари:
Публикуване на коментар